The meeting was called to order at
05:30 p.m. All present included
Chairman Dennis Mehr,
Commissioner Cheyne McDonald,
Commissioner Adel Murphy,
Commissioner John Reed,
and Commissioner Mike Scott.
Kevin Rudd reported that an outdoor theatre is allowed in Resort Commercial Zone. The proposed written text includes the following uses: theatrical and musical performances, outdoor gatherings, dining courtyard, symposiums, lectures, presentations, poetry readings, outdoor movies, and other formal and informal gatherings. The uses fall under the umbrella of an outdoor theatre. If approved, the proposed uses would be attached to the CUP as permitted uses. These are allowed uses for the RC zone. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends approval. This body and the City Council can make reasonable conditions on the CUP to offset the impact of the surrounding area. The TRC identified several areas to consider (see attached Staff report for details):
Hours of operation: Establish show times and closing times.
Noise: There are residents within 300 feet and consideration should be made to keep the noise level at an acceptable level. Ivins does not have a formal noise ordinance except for hours based on construction hours which is 6:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. There are exceptions for early morning concrete pour, etc. No decibel levels have been set in the City’s ordinances. Kayenta may be more restrictive.
Parking: This use requires a minimum of fifty (50) parking spaces. Currently, there are over one hundred fifty (150) parking spaces in the Coyote Gulch Commercial area. Coyote Gulch has not built-out and other businesses and uses may impact the parking. However, at this time parking is sufficient for current uses.
Seating: The estimate is one hundred twenty (120) occupants. The final occupancy load will be established by the Building Department and Fire Department based on a review of an approved seating plan and exiting plan.
Business License: A business license must be obtained prior to opening.
Occupancy Approval: A Certificate of Occupancy and final approval from the Fire Department must be obtained prior to opening.
Commissioner Reed asked if the conditional use changes the use for the entire zone or is it specific to the theatre. Can the theatre be expanded or is the conditional use specific to this structure and area?
Kevin Rudd explained that the proposed plan submitted which is the stage and seating area would become the location approved for the CUP. To expand beyond the area would trigger an amendment to the CUP.
Commissioner Murphy asked if the CUP is granted for a year and complaints were received, would there be a review.
Kevin Rudd explained that if a condition was placed on noise, and the condition was violated the CUP could be brought forward to this body and the City Council to review. If the condition was not corrected, the CUP could be revoked. Otherwise, the CUP goes with the property, not the owner and could be passed on to another property owner. Stopping use over a period of time could also trigger abandonment.
Some pictures were presented along with the floor plan of the theatre (available at the City office).
Chairman Mehr opened the Public Hearing.
Dale Coulam explained the public hearing process to the Commissioners and public.
Kevin Rudd stated that four (4) letters were received by Staff and submitted to the Commissioners that included public comments for the Commissioner’s to review.
Lance Anderson represented Coyote Gulch Cabaret Theater and advised that there is plenty of parking. He is meeting with Officer Randy Hancey, and based on the fire code the occupancy could be one hundred twenty (120). He commented that the Tuacahn Theatre starts later as the days become longer. The longest time for this theatre to be open would be 11:00 p.m. which includes moving people out. The show would start a little later because of the heat and end at 10:30 p.m. When the season is shorter, the performance might start earlier. He asked for those considerations. The noise level would be kept down based on the surrounding environment. People have different perspectives about noise, but they will figure out the noise level to make it function. There would be someone responsible for the noise level.
David Kiel’s home is within 300 feet of Coyote Gulch. He does not object to the outdoor theatre but felt it was a piece of a much larger puzzle. He asked that the Commission consider the cumulative effects. Their home was purchased in 2004, and they were fully aware the lot was next to a commercial area. Terry Martin advised that there would be restaurants and art galleries. Shortly after moving into the area Whitaker’s wind art has what he considers an industrial operation with machine tools and constant grinding. In their defense they did fully enclose the building and the noise has gone away. Shortly after that there were Saturday night concerts which rarely ended at 10:00 p.m. Then recycling bins were moved in with constant breaking glass. His concern about concerts was not the noise but the spot lights which negated using his deck and telescope. He asked the Commissioners to consider strict hours and noise rules.
Matt Martin spoke for the business owners and advised that Cheryl DeHart and Greg Federman sent letters to the Commission. The business owners want to create more business with the theatre. It’s too cold and windy in the winter for the theatre. The performances will be mostly in the spring, summer and fall and the number of shows will be limited. The permit doesn’t outline the number of performances. If it’s a play, he estimated three (3) performances a week for approximately 3-4 weeks, total 9-12 shows with approximately four (4) different types of performances throughout the year. Additional concerts would be on Friday or Saturday nights, most likely not on a week night. The hours would be taken very seriously and probably end the shows and clear parking by 11:00 p.m. If there were special circumstances for a performance, they would request that from the City on a one by one basis, similar to festivals. Xetava Gardens’ letter was submitted.
John Hunt lives at 967 Paiute Drive and had the pleasure of being involved in a production at the theatre last summer. The production was enjoyed by others outside the area, attracts additional people and brings new business. It adds diversity beyond the arts, and he felt it was very beneficial to Ivins. He supported the CUP.
Chairman Mehr closed the Public Hearing since there was no other response.
Chairman Mehr acknowledged that a letter was submitted by Greg Federman who supports the CUP.
Commissioner Reed commented that the Commission doesn’t just deal with the zoning and the physical layout of the City. They should look at the community as a whole and what it takes to make the City a community, not a bunch of subdivisions. The arts are a resource for the community, and many communities subsidize the arts. Salt Lake County is funding neighborhood theatres. Ivins has a couple of theatres that are self-funded. He disclosed that he lives in Kayenta Patio Homes which is close to Coyote Gulch Village, and he also gets the impact of traffic and headlights in his bedroom windows. He asked if there were any conditions placed on the Tuacahn Theatre.
Kevin Rudd was not aware of any.
Commissioner Reed asked that the Commissioners keep in mind there is precedent and consistency from one use to the next use while at the same time allowing for variation as to where it is placed in the neighborhood. Fireworks or lights on the mountain are not the issue but traffic impact is. To be a community resource that resource has to be integrated into the community, but not take the community over. Any conditions put on the permit will have to allow the theatre to function. He commented on the following:
Noise: In reference to determining noise level, to some people it will be annoying and to others it is not with the same given loudness level. He felt it may be an impossible job for code enforcement to control. He researched different noise ordinances from several cities that had similar uses. The information was distributed to the Commissioners. Most of the city ordinances are consistent for an amphitheatre or outdoor auditorium, and the noise level would be 70 DB. Anything above that level could result in enforcement action. A normal conversation of three (3) to five (5) feet is 60-70 decibels. If you were to hear the sound at 70 DB levels it would be similar to someone talking in a normal conversation. The measurement is typically taken at the edge of the property with the usage.
Parking/Traffic: He compared the traffic on Tuacahn Drive and Kayenta Parkway. The traffic at Tuacahn is not limited, and there is more traffic for Tuacahn than there would be for the Coyote Gulch Theatre. The homes on Tuacahn Drive are much closer in proximity than any houses on Kayenta Parkway. Look at what has been allowed for traffic and take that into consideration for some consistency as we move forward on conditions regarding traffic impact. His estimate for traffic was approximately 50-60 cars, and it only took him 10-15 seconds to get out of the parking lot which equates to approximately fifteen (15) minutes to clear the parking lot.
Hours of Operation: Since the performances are summer, spring and fall, the hours should be varied for weekend and weekday usage taking the residents into consideration. Suggestions: Sunday-Wednesday until 10:00 p.m.; Thursday-Saturday until 10:30 p.m. These performances are not professional, and sometimes it takes longer for amateurs to get through with a performance than professionals.
Commissioner McDonald asked if the existing noise ordinance has a time limit set on the noise level.
Dale Coulam explained that the noise ordinance relates to construction building hours. Noise as far as a nuisance is very broad and is not defined. Even though there is not a city-wide noise ordinance, it is possible as suggested by Commissioner Reed to consider noise levels as a condition and to minimize the impact on the neighboring properties, and conditions could also include the lights.
Commissioner Murphy felt there should be some lighting restrictions. The night sky is one of the reasons that people live in Ivins, and lights shining in their homes forty-eight days out of the year interfere with the night sky.
Commissioner Scott referred to a letter received from Cheryl DeHart that mentioned Kayenta’s CC&R’s and asked if their CC&R’s would be an appropriate control on noise.
Commissioner Reed stated that the area in Coyote Gulch is not covered by CC&R’s. Some associations within Kayenta have combined their CC&R’s but several have different CC&R’s.
Dale Coulam explained that the City does not enforce CC&R’s. However, the private associations may have some enforcement. He understood the letter to say that their CC&R’s restrict noise, lighting, etc. in what they can do, and why isn’t the Coyote Gulch area of Kayenta being restricted. They are suggesting the City impose some conditions to address those issues.
Commissioner Reed explained that the Saturday night concerts have been located in the upper part of the parking area. The theatre stage faces west with shade cells on the top. There are concrete walls around the area, and lights would be shining on the stage and possibly below the shade cells which would restrict to some degree the lights bouncing upwards. He explained the lighting further but felt the intent was to keep the usage within the designated area of Coyote Gulch so that it’s not a nuisance to the community.
Chairman Mehr stated that they did receive some letters of opposition from some of those that spoke in the meeting although they don’t have many objections but have concerns about the limits and whether it will be enforced appropriately. Mr. Kiel was concerned about the cumulative effect and where does the City draw the line. He mentioned the breaking of glass, recycling bins, machinery, grinding, etc. The business owners have also mentioned that the theatre would create business, adding diversity and Commissioner Reed’s comments about making it more of a sense of developing an entire community. He was in favor of supporting the CUP and following the Staff’s recommendation but felt the Commissioners should discuss conditions such as noise level, hours of operation, etc.
Commissioner Reed commented that very few weekend performances get over by 10:00 p.m. and also based on the amateur status. The traffic impacts will be less than other areas as mentioned.
The consensus of the Commissioners was that they were in agreement with the TRC’s recommendations on business license, occupancy approval, seating, and parking. The following was discussed:
Hours of Operation: 9:00 am - 10:00 pm Sunday- Wednesday; 9:00 am - 10:30 pm Thursday - Saturday The consensus was to allow normal business hours since the proposed list suggested other gatherings such as lectures, presentations, poetry readings, etc. and not limit the theatre to night performances. It was also mentioned that the City could not regulate how long it took people to depart. There was concern about the summer because Tuacahn’s shows are later in the summer but felt 10:30 pm was a good time. The other concern was that there are no homes next to Tuacahn to impact the residents but there is in this area.
Noise: Commissioner Reed felt it should not exceed 70 DB at the edge of the Coyote Gulch property during the hours of operation and no noise above ambiance at any time. Example: The resident could walk out and not distinguish the noise level from any other noise.
Kevin Rudd suggested that if the Commissioners want to set a decibel level that code enforcement would go out during the practice performance to check the decibel levels instead of during the performance and have to shut them done.
The consensus was that the noise level should be set but Commissioner Mehr was very concerned how the enforcement would work if the performance was higher than the suggested levels.
Kevin Rudd explained that the enforcement would be based on complaints.
Commissioner Reed stated that the suggested noise level is standard levels within city ordinances and gives the enforcement officer something to measure.
Dale Coulam explained that the Commissioners can only impose reasonable conditions such as were presented by Commissioner Reed or come up with an alternative standard to mitigate the adverse impacts.
Lighting: Commissioner Reed suggested lighting shall be headed and directed toward the stage, and no lamps should be visible from any adjacent property. The residents can see light source but not the lamp.
Commissioner Mehr asked if there should be any stipulation about stage lights versus exit egress lighting when production is over and the stage lights are turned off.
Commissioner Reed felt that the lights should be controlled regardless of the source.
MOTION: Commissioner John Reed moved to recommend approval of a Class V Conditional Use for the Coyote Gulch Cabaret Theater located at 847 Coyote Gulch CT, Lance Anderson, applicant, subject to the following conditions:
a. The hours of operation shall be from 9:00 am - 10:00 pm Sunday through Wednesday and 9:00 am - 10:30 pm Thursday through Saturday.
b. The noise level shall not exceed 70 decibels at the edge of the property during the hours of operation. There should be no noise above ambient at other times.
c. Shall obtain a Business License and Certificate of Occupancy.
d. Lighting shall be hooded and directed at the stage. No lamps shall be directly visible from adjacent properties.
SECOND: Commissioner Cheyne McDonald
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Chairman Dennis Mehr |
AYE |
| Commissioner Cheyne McDonald |
AYE |
| Commissioner Adel Murphy |
AYE |
| Commissioner John Reed |
AYE |
| Commissioner Mike Scott |
AYE |
Kevin Rudd reported that this Zone Change would change the existing property from RA-5 (Res. Agriculture Min. 5-aces) to RE-25 (Res. Estates Min. 25,000 sq ft). This is a seventy (70) acre parcel. There are some areas that do not fall into sensitive lands but they are insignificant. Most of these parcels will be affected by sensitive lands and subject to the requirements of Ivins City Zoning Ordinance Section 802 Sensitive Lands. These sections require a sensitive lands determination inventory, which clearly defines the type and amount of sensitive lands. The property owner at his expense shall provide a detail map that shows the areas that could be sensitive lands. The documents have been provided and included with the Staff report (copies available at the City office). One map identifies the slopes on the property and the second map details rock fall which falls under geological hazards. The seventy (70) acres is a significant part of Ivins which is located on the Red Mountain. The Planning Commission should take time and give serious consideration since it is located in sensitive lands. An important consideration is the densities within sensitive lands. Based on the inventory maps the maximum densities (based on 70 acres) are as follows: RE-25 (21 lots), RE-37 (14 lots), RE-43 (12 lots), RE-75 (7 lots) and RA-5 (2 lots). The existing zone is RA-5 and if the Sensitive Lands Ordinance is applied it would allow a maximum density of two (2) lots. The Sensitive Lands Ordinance is not a prohibited document that is not a prohibitive document. It does not prohibit developers from developing in sensitive lands but regulates how the property is developed. Cannot build in a wash or hazardous areas. Homes cannot be built in a wash or hazardous areas. If a geological report says its high hazard, the City would say no homes should be built in those areas. Mr. Rudd explained in detailed the densities allowed under each zone. The geological report received identified only two areas that were capable of being developed. He distributed the map indicating these areas. He explained that this was not a project review, and they would not get into how these parcels would be developed or where homes would be placed. In reference to any questions regarding the Sensitive Lands Ordinance, he invited anyone to come to his office since it takes some time to explain.
Commissioner Reed asked if the parcels surrounding the proposed Zone Change were zoned prior to the passing of the Sensitive Lands Ordinance
Kevin Rudd explained that those parcels occurred during the same time that the Planning Commission and City Council did a complete rewrite (2005) of the Zone Map and the Sensitive Lands Ordinance. Those parcels did fall under the Sensitive Lands Ordinance.
Chairman Mehr opened the Public Hearing.
Roger Siddoway lives at 738 Agave Way which backs up to the berm which is south of the two water tanks. Part of what is going on is to build a road and to build another water tank. He grew up in Salt Lake City and watched the homes build up the mountains which grew higher and higher. He felt that was not what Ivins is about with regards to the Red Mountain in Kayenta. If a home was built up above the berm and across he probably would not be able to see it but it would be visible driving into the Ivins from Taviawk Drive. The concern is does the City want to keep building up the mountain. He was not in favor of that area being developed.
Steve Williams owns a partial interest in one of the parcels which was annexed into the City June 2, 1980 and zoned RA-1 (Resid. Agricultural min. 1 acre). The parcel was down zoned during the new master plan. He was requesting zoning similar to the other existing zones because we have spot zoning now. There are 25,000 square foot lots to the west, 10,000 square foot lots to south and then a five (5) acre zone. The parcel was annexed in for building lots. There were no sensitive lands issues, no Taviawk Subdivision, and it all came in as part of Taviawk. There were no restrictions when it was annexed into the City and was zoned for one (1) acre lots. We are requesting RE-25 and according to Kevin Rudd’s map there would be twenty-one (21) lots on seventy (70) acres which is one (1) lot per 3.5 acres. It is not unreasonable zoning for the contiguous parcel. His ownership interest is a portion of the property south of the tank which is east of the dike. He’s a commercial real estate appraiser. He feels that the property is developable and wants to develop it sometimes in the future.
Lance Anderson explained that he had a meeting with Taviawk owners last night to clear up confusion. The sensitive land does affect the overall densities. If the parcels were not in sensitive lands, the density would allow 120 lots. The brown areas on the map drop it down to 5% density. Only fifty-eight (58) acres of the seventy (70) acres is being used for development which is the purpose of RE-25. The current RA-5 zone was a holding pattern, and at one time the area was RA-1. He cannot show the homeowners a map because we cannot relate zoning to a subdivision because at this stage it doesn’t relate to anything. We are looking at developing 12-13 lots. One thing driving the zone change is a future water tank although that doesn’t relate to the zone change. The jump between RE-25 and RE-37 is considerable. There should be another zone between the two (2) zones. The sensitive lands allow something in between those zones based on the fifty-eight (58) acres. The developable slopes in these parcels are less aggressive compared to the slopes in Taviawk Subdivisions.
Judy Sip lives at 1008 Kanavi Way and she feels the property is inaccessible to homes. She questioned if the seventy (70) acre plan can be reduced to fifty-eight (58) acres. The slope is incredibly steep in the area from 70 to 58 acres. Concerned about what the fire department would say about the water pressure that would be needed for fire protection. At present, she has adequate water pressure but her neighbor that is higher up the hill does not have adequate water pressure unless a system is put in to boost it up. Property owners have a right to develop homes but she feels this area should be severely restricted. She would like to see the number reduced even if the zoning is RE-25 to approximately 10-14 lots. The area cannot accommodate twenty-one (21) lots.
Slava Lumbomudrov lives at 782 Agave Way near Mr. Siddoway and he agrees with his comments. He lived in Salt Lake for thirty-five (35) years and saw homes go up Mount Olympus which is similar to the Red Mountain. The Red Mountain has unique features, and he asked that they think very carefully about any changes that are made by allowing housing. Also concerned if the ordinance takes into account earthquakes. In Salt Lake earthquakes were a serious problem. It would not take much of an earthquake to release rocks to slide down the mountain and cause damage to homes and individuals. There has been one major rock slide in the Agave area that came close to the area proposed. Water falls bring down smaller rocks. New roads within the area would be the responsibility of all the homeowners in Taviawk, and they would have to pay the additional expense. They would bear the burden paying for the roads and the maintenance. He asked for very careful consideration and to maintain the vision of the Red Mountain.
Skip Blythe lives on Agave Way. Lance Anderson mentioned in a meeting last night that the intent is to build 12-13 homes. He understood that RE-37 allowed horses, and he felt that horses were not compatible for that area. We understand the area can be and will be developed. However, he and others are more supportive of RE-43(Res. Estates Min. 43,000 Sq Ft) zone with a maximum of twelve (12) lots.
Lance Anderson clarified that the fifty-eight (58) acres stops at a tax identification number. The other portion of the seventy (70) acres would not be in the proposed zone change if the other parcels weren’t already zoned RE-25. It is not our intent to put houses in that area and cannot because of the sensitive lands but that parcel could be used in a future subdivision as open space. It is his understanding that it could not be utilized for housing because of the Sensitive Lands. In reference to height, the contour line is lower than most of the housing built above the tank line in Taviawk. It would be encroaching less upon the mountain. Most of the homes drop down at the end of Shinava Way so the homes would be lower than the houses now, and the rest of the homes would follow the same contour line. The steeper slopes allows less disturbance. It is controlled by the Zoning and the Sensitive Lands Ordinances which affect the lot size and the disturbance area within the lot. It would be very restrictive within the RE-25. The intent is to build 12-13 homes. If the residents understood the sensitive lands based on the lot size and disturbance, then the residents would feel more comfortable.
Chairman Mehr closed the Public Hearing since there was no other response.
Kevin Rudd addressed some of their comments in regards to the question about seventy (70) acres or fifty-eight (58) acres. In order to achieve the densities mentioned the development plan would have to include the seventy (70) acres. If reduced to fifty-eight (58) acres, the density would reduce significantly. The Sensitive Lands’ goal would be the areas that are not part of the lots which would remain in some type of permanent open space, and no development on the open space would be allowed. If the applicant wanted to reduce the acreage, the densities would have to be reviewed.
There are minimum water pressures for the homes and for the Fire Department. A subdivision application has to meet the minimum requirements or the subdivision will not be approved.
Horses are not allowed in RE-37 and RE-43 zones except for a couple of zones such as RE-37 in Padre Canyon and RE-12.5 in the Old Township areas that are grandfather in. There are no animals allowed in new subdivisions zonee as RE-37. To have horses it would have to be an RA (Residential Agriculture) zone.
Commissioner Reed asked for an explanation of the percentage of the disturbance area and how the sensitive lands overlay impacts it.
Kevin Rudd stated that it is based upon the size of the lot. A 25,000 square foot lot may not allow a big enough building disturbance area. Even though if it is zoned RE-25 it would probably have to be a much bigger lot in order to create a big enough disturbance area to build a home. Depending on the slope, the maximum disturbance is 10-20%. Example: With a 25,000 square foot lot the disturbance would be 10% or 2,500 square feet which would include the driveway, landscape, etc. They could not get much of a house on that size lot.
Commissioner Reed asked about a 12-14% slope and what the disturbance percentage would be.
Kevin Rudd explained the slope percentages: 12%-13% slope is 25% disturbance; 13%-14% slope is 20% disturbance; 14%-15% slope is 15% disturbance and above that is 10%. The Sensitive Lands Committee not only reviews the sensitive lands but any home permit built within sensitive lands based on the Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Murphy asked if 10-12 homes are built would anything after that become permanent open space.
Kevin Rudd stated, "Correct." He gave an example.
Commissioner Murphy asked if the Commission can designate open space when the developer hasn’t even split off the portion that they want to build on. It’s almost dual-zoning within a tax identification number.
Dale Coulam stated that the Commission cannot designate it but the developer can reflect it on their plan. The developer designates areas that remain as open space and the buildable areas. The Commission cannot tell them where to put their homes but the developer can come in with the plan. He asked Kevin Rudd if the developer received approval on twenty-one (21) lots but brought in a plan for twelve (12) homes, could the developer come back in at a later date, disturb more area, and request nine (9) additional lots?
Kevin Rudd stated that they would have to go through the process. If a plan says open space, he felt the Sensitive Lands Committee would want it to remain open space. The developer would have to lay his cards on the table upfront instead of coming back five (5) years later. It would also be platted as open space. The Sensitive Lands Committee has gone as far as recommending a conservation easement on other properties which protects open space being developed.
Commissioner Reed asked if the developer came back in with a plan based on twelve (12) lots on fifty-eight (58) acres, could the additional acreage be reflected on some future plan.
Kevin Rudd felt that it would have to be contiguous with the property or attached with the property that they were proposing as open space.
Commissioner Scott asked if the developer is looking at developing 12-14 lots, is there a technical reason why we would approve a rezone for RE-25 instead of RE-37.
Kevin Rudd stated that is the applicant’s request. This body has the ability to make a recommendation to the City Council based upon the information heard, and the information Staff has submitted such as the staff report and inventory maps. The Commissioners have three (3) choices: It can be approved as submitted, deny with a recommendation for another approval requesting another zone that the Commissioner’s feel is appropriate or leave the zoning as is.
Commissioner Scott asked about the elevation issue on how high up housing could be developed on the Red Mountain.
Kevin Rudd explained that the Rock Fall Map will determine that from happening. The map identifies high hazard as very low. The report from the engineers recommends no homes in the high hazard. That would keep any development from going in that area, and the report would back up Staff and the Commission to say no development. It would not be a taking.
Commissioner Reed stated that part of the purpose of Sensitive Lands Ordinance was to incentivize clustering to pull development down optimum slopes to still allow people to develop and to give them the benefit of their entire property but to pull it off from the top of higher slopes. Instead of evenly distributing lots across the whole area, give smaller denser lots down low on the slope which in turn reduces the visual impact.
Kevin Rudd stated that he has explained this to the developers/owners but wanted the Commission to be aware that there are transferrable sensitive lands development rights. The ordinance allows density rights to be transferred to another area that is not within sensitive lands, and an owner can get a density bonus when that is done.
Chairman Mehr was not prepared to go forward with the Zone Change. There have been good comments from the public in terms of being opposed, those in favor, some asking for restrictions, etc. He felt the Commission should take more time, study the options and visit the area to understand the issues better. The concerns are very legitimate and one concern is what do we want Ivins to look like, there are rights to the property owner and the Red Mountain is a community icon. He felt the discussion should be continued during the next meeting.
Kevin Rudd suggested scheduling a field trip prior to the next meeting, and explained it would be open to the public.
After further discussion, the Commissioners agreed to schedule a field trip for May 5, 2009 at 5:00 pm and to meet at the City Hall.
MOTION: Commissioner John Reed moved to continue a recommendation on Zone Changes from RA-5 (Res. Agriculture Min. 5-Acres) to RE-25 (Res. Estates Min. 25,000 Sq Ft) located on various parcels adjoining the Taviawk Subdivisions Phase II, Phase III, Phase IV, Phase V, Phase VI, Phase VII and Summit Ridge Phase 2. Kayenta Development, Inc., applicant.
SECOND: Commissioner Adel Murphy
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Chairman Dennis Mehr |
AYE |
| Commissioner Cheyne McDonald |
AYE |
| Commissioner Adel Murphy |
AYE |
| Commissioner John Reed |
AYE |
| Commissioner Mike Scott |
AYE |