All present included Mayor Hart,
Council Member Elwell,
Council Member McDonald,
Council Member Jolley,
Council Member Roberts,
Council Member Rusick,
and
City Recorder Kari D. Jimenez.
STAFF:
City Manager Judy Gubler,
Public Safety Director Bob Flowers,
City Engineer Charles Gillette,
Public Works Director Dave Glenn,
Building and Zoning Administrator Kevin Rudd,
and
Director of Finance Alan Rae.
EXCUSED: None.
Audience: George Stoddard, McKenzie Hansen, W. Romberger, Dennis Mehr, Lance Anderson, Connie Butterfield, Susan McDonald and others who did not sign in.
Council Member Jolley led the Flag Salute.
Council Member Jolley gave the Invocation.
The Mayor and City Council Members stated they had no conflicts of interest with items on this meeting’s agenda.
Mayor Hart provided a Storm Water Issues and Mitigation Plan outline and an article titled "Protecting America’s Waters is Top EPA Priority for 2010 and Beyond". A copy of the outline and article are available by request through Ivins City Hall. Mayor Hart indicated Ivins City is subject to the storm water management provisions of the Clean Water Act and is currently required to meet the Phase Two requirements of that legislation. It is likely that in the future Ivins will be required to test its storm water discharge and at that time will be in non-compliance and given a period of time to correct the deficiencies. Ivins old township area is the most problematic for contaminated discharge. Mayor Hart has taken the position that as a storm water project required by an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) regulation, it falls under an unfunded Federal mandate and as such the City has submitted a funding request for the entire project cost of storm water curb and gutter, roads and sidewalks for the old township. Mayor Hart discussed funding with Congressman Matheson who indicated that Federal funding for this type of project rarely covers all of the cost but that the more willing a City is to participate in the cost, the more likely Federal support becomes. Mayor Hart referred to an SID (Special Improvement District) to pay for a portion of the improvements and suggested the possibility that completing the improvements for the original township would have enough value to the community as a whole that everyone would be willing to participate in a modest way. One approach could be to split the cost three ways with the City paying half of the curb, gutter and roads and the Federal Government funding the other half. The remaining sidewalk portion of the project could be covered by an SID. Mayor Hart proposed that the City move forward with the design and engineering work which would allow the City to be prepared with a shovel ready project when the funding mechanisms are in place.
Charles Gillette indicated the cost estimate for the project is $6 million dollars. Alan Rae spoke regarding funding options and provided a PowerPoint presentation to the City Council. A copy of the presentation is available by request through Ivins City Hall. There are Build America Bonds available through Washington County as an element to the Federal Government’s stimulus. Interest rates are low at this time and there is also a tax credit that effectively lowers the City’s interest rate. Washington County would like the bonds committed before the end of June, 2010 because they need to be used before the end of the year. Dave Glenn addressed the maintenance issues regarding the erosion and deteriorating roads in the old township area and indicated the roads are difficult to clean, expensive to patch and become narrower each time the roads are eroded. If curb and gutter is not put in, the City will need to look at other alternatives.
Council Member Elwell agreed that something needs to be done now to address the issues and indicated the City needs to move forward with the design and engineering of the project. Council Member Jolley agreed and referred to the safety of the children walking to school and suggested the possibility of designating 100 South and 200 South as one-way streets until the improvements are complete. Council Member McDonald indicated it is important for the City to move forward with the improvements and now is the best time to do so. Council Member Roberts supports the City moving forward due to the safety issues but is concerned with a property tax levy and would rather see a different way to pay for the project. Council Member Roberts is in opposition to 100 South and 200 South being designated as one-way streets. Council Member Rusick indicated the City should move forward but is concerned with the cost and thought the project was approximately $10 million dollars rather than $6 million. Chuck Gillette referred to the water systems and indicated those systems would bring the cost up to $10 million dollars. The old township project could be done in a way that removing and replacing asphalt for the placement of water systems could be limited which would significantly reduce the costs.
Mayor Hart inquired as to when payments would be required for an SID. Alan Rae indicated the time frame is generally one year after the project is complete. The Mayor and City Council agreed that the City should move forward with committing the Build America Bonds through Washington County.
Chief Flowers referred to the draft ordinance that contains several changes. A copy of the draft ordinance is available by request through Ivins City Hall. The Mayor and City Council discussed the changes at length and determined the following additional changes would be made to the ordinance: It will be clarified in Section 6.05.106(2) regarding "Attacking Dogs" that it is at the Director’s discretion to determine whether or not an animal is vicious but that determination will be made after a review panel has been convened and the matter discussed; the following language will be added in the same section under (2) "When there have been two (2) reported attacks by the same dog, a panel review will be convened where the dog may be deemed vicious. Regardless of number of bites, a panel review may be convened on a case by case basis as determined by the Director."; the word "had" will be changed to "hand" in the same section under (2)(b); rather than specifying dogs in section 6.05.107 "Vicious Animals", it will read "an animal" or "the animal"; the penalty in section 6.05.108 "Animal Waste Disposal" will be an infraction rather than a Class B Misdemeanor; the City Attorney will look at the option of including the full sections of the Utah Code referenced in section 6.05.110 "Cruelty to Animals"; the name in the "Animal Shelter" section and throughout the ordinance will be "The Ivins City Animal Shelter and Adoption Center"; the time frame in section 6.05.101 "Harboring Stray Dogs" to either return a stray dog to its owner or to notify the Division will be forty-eight (48) hours; the word "further" in the second to last line of section 6.06.103 "Period of Impound" will be removed and it will read "as approved" rather than "further as approved"; and the last sentence in section 6.03.102(3) "Vaccination" will be changed to "Any adoptable animal not reclaimed within the minimum impound period shall be subject to disposition as defined and set forth herein."
There was a lengthy discussion relating to section 6.06.103 "Period of Impound" and the Review Panel. Chief Flowers referred to animals that have been in the shelter for a long period of time and may be unadoptable, ill or have a similar situation. It is better to form a panel, make a decision as a group and talk about any decision that may be reached for the situation. Council Member McDonald is concerned with the length of time the City is agreeing to hold the animals due to the expense to the City and the residents of Ivins. He requested clarification on the expenses. Council Member Elwell indicated he has tried to be careful and admitted to being somewhat uncomfortable with being included in the process of revising the ordinance without the City Council’s direction. He made it very clear to Chief Flowers and the others that worked on the changes to the ordinance that whatever was brought forward, the others needed to be comfortable with it. Council Member Elwell stated his involvement and his offerings were quite minor and wanted to make sure there is an understanding of what FIAS’ (Friends of Ivins Animal Shelter) role is with the City. Council Member Elwell suggested a change as to how the Review Panel is identified in the ordinance and referred to former Mayor Barney assisting FIAS in the Articles of Incorporation for the 501(c)(3) corporation. Under Article 2 "Purpose" it indicates "the specific purpose for which the corporation is organized is to assist Ivins City No Kill Animal Shelter to ensure the health, safety and welfare of all animals at the shelter, consistent with section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code." From day one an animal is basically under the co-care of the City and FIAS. FIAS has taken responsibility for the medications and food. There is a certain level of food that the City provides but that is relieved through the efforts of the 501(c)(3). Whether an animal is kept for one hundred twenty (120) days or for two hundred forty (240) days, the City does not spend any additional money. If an animal is in the shelter longer, the City has less and less of any type of up keep or care for that animal as far as monetary output because that falls upon FIAS. FIAS is the only organization that can provide information to the Panel relating to funding being available to keep an animal in the shelter if there is room, beyond one hundred twenty (120) days. The Panel can determine if an animal is still adoptable or may need to be re-trained. FIAS’ input to the Panel for their review is invaluable. Council Member Elwell suggested FIAS be included in the ordinance and understood the City Manager and City Attorney had reservations with having FIAS included in the ordinance and he has discussed those reservations with Chief Flowers and suggested the following language be included in the "Review Panel" definition section "The Review Panel shall be made up of the Animal Control Officer/Shelter Manager, Director and FIAS President or designated representative or other 501(c)(3) organization whose Articles of Incorporation is specific to the care and placement of animals within the Ivins Animal Shelter and any others that the Director feels appropriate." Mayor Hart indicated his primary concern with including FIAS in the ordinance is if FIAS were to cease to exist in the future, it would be odd for a non-existing entity to be named in the ordinance. Judy Gubler indicated FIAS is very closely associated with the Ivins Animal Shelter and that although food, veterinary care and retraining are paid for, from a budgetary standpoint, there is on-going up keep that includes staff time, building costs and it is when the City runs out of room that may be an issue. Council Member Rusick indicated those costs are not going to go away under any circumstances because the costs for heating, electric etc. are still going to be paid. Council Member Rusick agrees that FIAS should have a representative on the Review Panel and thinks that as the ordinance is current written, it gives the Director of Public Safety the flexibility to deal with hard situations. The environment now is for the preservation of animals and the shelter has been working fine. The whole purpose was to build a No Kill shelter. If there is going to be a Panel, it has to have at least one (1) FIAS representative on the Panel because FIAS is a big part of the way the Ivins shelter functions and it is also the group that will find an alternative. FIAS has a universe of contacts that is starting to grow in other parts of the country. The City should not do anything to dissuade that and there should not be anything onerous to appear in the ordinance. Council Member Rusick would like to add Council Member Elwell’s language.
Council Member Elwell referred to costs and knows the City is concerned with budget and costs and asked how the City identifies the monetary benefit to the City. When the City looks at what it is getting by having a No Kill shelter, the City gets some of the greatest economic development advertising in the world and it is free through Red Mountain Spa, word of mouth and by people seeing what the City is doing with the animal shelter and it is increasing the popularity of Ivins City. If the City were able to place a monetary value on the shelter, it would greatly exceed any amount of electricity, water, people working in the shelter etc. especially if the City embraces volunteerism. Council Member Rusick referred to the last budget review and indicated she was not happy with the way animal shelter expenses were broken out. It should be broken out better and it is not appropriate the way the expenses of the animal shelter are being recorded. Chief Flowers indicated he is working on that issue. Council Member McDonald indicated FIAS is a great part of the Ivins Animal Shelter and expressed the same concern of Mayor Hart regarding the potential for FIAS to cease to exist in the future. It would be good to know what the expenses are for the animal shelter. Council Member McDonald disagrees on there being no cost difference for two (2) animals or ten (10) animals. There is going to be more man power and greater costs if there are more animals. Chief Flowers indicated he is working with FIAS to determine how much FIAS contributes to the Ivins Animal Shelter. Judy Gubler responded to the budget issue and indicated that when the City opened the budget, Council Member McDonald had asked that the animal shelter costs be separated out as best the City could at that point. That information was submitted to the Council and can be provided to them again. The City has combined Public Safety into one budget that includes Law Enforcement, Fire, EMS and Animal Control. It was combined because it is one department but the City has been questioning that for some time. Mayor Hart would like the City Attorney to look at including a private entity being named in an ordinance. Council Member Roberts indicated that if FIAS ceased to exist, the ordinance could be addressed by the City Council at that time. Council Member Elwell referred to being a No Kill animal shelter and indicated that part of placing animals and receiving donations is selling the No Kill animal shelter. In the animal rescue world, Ivins is a No Kill animal shelter but one problem the animal shelter has been facing for sometime is the No Kill term runs into conflict with others who continue to correct and say that Ivins is not a No Kill shelter but have adopted a No Kill philosophy. It is one in the same to Council Member Elwell and he does not see the difference but since there is a perception of there being a difference, every time that correction is made in the public, it is negative for the shelter. Council Member Elwell suggested there be language to combine the No Kill and No Kill philosophy into one and referred to section 6.01.101 "Policy" and requested the following be included in that section "It is the policy of the Ivins City No Kill Municipal Shelter/Adoption Center that no adoptable animal shall be euthanized if it can be adopted into a suitable home or transferred to a qualified rescue organization." Council Member Elwell would also like to add a definition that describes the difference that a non-profit rescue group would have as a No Kill philosophy as opposed to No Kill Municipal Shelter and suggested the following definition: "No Kill Municipal Animal Shelter/Adoption Center does not preclude the euthenization of any animal when such action is necessary to ensure the public health, safety and welfare, nor does it prohibit the euthenization of sick or injured animals where no viable humane alternative remains." Council Member Rusick would like to see Council Member Elwell’s language added to the ordinance for the Council to review. Judy Gubler responded and indicated that the clarification on whether it was a philosophy or a No Kill Shelter came about when the original ordinance was passed in 2006. To say that a shelter is a No Kill has certain implications. Judy reviewed information on what Nathan Winograd did and what the No Kill philosophy entails including adoption hours and the extraordinary efforts that a shelter would go to. With Council Member Elwell’s definition and quantifiers, to ensure it is not confused, as was the Council’s concern when the original ordinance was passed, was that the City would somehow be obligated to be an absolute No Kill shelter under extraordinary circumstances. The direction in 2006 from the Council was clearly not to state that it was a No Kill shelter but to proceed with the practices described in the ordinance. That is the Council’s policy decision and the City takes the Council’s direction.
MOTION: Council Member Rusick moved to continue consideration of the animal ordinance to the next Council meeting.
SECOND: Council Member McDonald
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Council Member Elwell |
AYE |
| Council Member McDonald |
AYE |
| Council Member Jolley |
AYE |
| Council Member Roberts |
AYE |
| Council Member Rusick |
AYE |
Council Member Elwell referred to the Compensatory Service Worker in the Volunteers General Directive Definitions and indicated there is no enabling portion in the body of the document. Council Member Elwell suggested where a Volunteer is identified other than a Volunteer Safety Officer, use "Volunteer/Compensatory Service Worker" or somehow place that in the body of the document or indicate under the "Volunteer" definition that volunteer "may" include or "may not" include. Council Member Elwell is concerned with the City assuming that because of the current wording in the document that the City could go ahead with parole, probation or diversion or sentence. Council Member Rusick indicated a Compensatory Service Worker is an individual who has been ordered to perform public service. Judy Gubler indicated Colin Harrison wants to be able to have parolees perform certain functions for the City. Judy Gubler and Mayor Hart indicated the City Attorney needs to review the Definitions. Council Member Elwell does not have an objection to continuing this item until the next City Council meeting but would like to discuss his concerns. Council Member Elwell referred to "Fitness for Duty" and the verbiage "Volunteers in safety sensitive positions, or who have a CDL license, shall be subject to the City’s random drug testing policy." and inquired if someone has a commercial drivers license and is petting animals, should that trigger a random drug test. Council Member Elwell referred to "Volunteer Support & Recognition" under "Insurance" it indicates "operating City owned vehicles or equipment when the volunteer is properly licensed and authorized to do so" and inquired if the random drug testing for an individual holding a CDL may be for an individual that is performing the driving service for the City as opposed to any volunteer that has a CDL license. Council Member Elwell also referred to "Insurance" where it indicates "Volunteers shall be considered and covered as employees of the City for the limited purposes of workers compensation medical benefits...etc." and "liability protection...etc." and inquired if that is correct. Judy Gubler indicated that is correct and that it is required by law which is why the City has to keep track of volunteers carefully. Volunteers are reported to Workers Compensation and the City’s insurance company for liability and indemnification. They are covered at no extra cost as long as the City supervises, trains and controls the volunteers. Council Member Elwell indicated that seems strange. Judy Gubler indicated otherwise the City would not have volunteer firefighters. Council Member Elwell stated there is a difference in that because once the volunteer firefighters respond, they are no longer a volunteer because they are being paid. He understood Safety Officers but not someone petting a cat under this category. Judy Gubler indicated the City would not want to see someone get bit while petting a cat and not be covered. Council Member Elwell indicated that at the time the Volunteers General Directive policy was approved, he had an issue with the drug screening and referred to "Criminal Background Screening" and "Drug Screening" procedures. Council Member Elwell indicated that to him, the background check is what tells an individual's story. The drug test is only as good as the day it is taken. An individual can volunteer with the school district and not be required to have a background check or drug screening. He does not have a problem with drug testing per se but sees a big difference in those who are going to be doing sensitive things for the City. He has a problem with requiring a seventy (70) year old who wants to go into the shelter and play with a cat to make sure it is domesticated or to walk a dog or to clean up after the animals. On one hand the City can say if there isn’t anything to hide, what is the problem but the problem is that in a small community it can be a real concern if someone fails a drug test. Council Member Elwell has not been able to identify one shelter in the area that requires drug testing and referred to the "Criminal Background Screening" that indicates "Certain volunteer positions may, and all volunteer safety officer positions shall, require a criminal background check". Council Member Elwell suggested the City have a similar description under Drug Screening. He knows one of the objections is and has been a possible issue relating to insurance rates. Council Member Elwell would like verifiable and sufficient information regarding insurance rates so each Council Member can do their own research. Council Member Rusick agreed and inquired if all employees have to pass drug tests. Judy Gubler stated absolutely and that it is a requirement. Council Member Rusick indicated the City Council Members are employees and Judy Gubler indicated they are not employees but are elected officials. Council Member Rusick inquired if that’s the case why the Council Members are required to pay social security and receive employment compensation. Judy Gubler indicated there are several questions that she does not have immediate answers to but she will research them and report back to the Council. Referring to the youth programs, Judy is unaware of the City requiring a seven (7) year old to be drug tested but the youth would be part of a City program and are supervised by an adult. If someone does not pass a drug test, it is very private and is between the individual being tested and one person at the City. They are the only individuals that receive the results of the test and if the results are disclosed, it would be disclosed by the individual who was tested. Council Member Elwell indicated it could be disclosed by the fact that the person was not accepted as a volunteer. Judy Gubler indicated the reason why the individual is not a volunteer would not be disclosed. Judy Gubler indicated Council Member Elwell’s concerns are with drug testing for volunteers at the animal shelter and if that needs to be exempt from drug testing and the City is not exposed to liability, she does not have an issue with that. Judy Gubler will discuss these issues with the City Attorney and they will report back to the City Council. Council Member Elwell referred to the City being in the process of impaneling individuals to various committees and inquired if they are considered volunteers or what category those individuals would be in. Mayor Hart indicated the City Attorney would need to address that. Council Member Jolley referred to "Dress Code" and inquired if this section should address hair styles and body piercings and suggested the City Attorney also look at that.
MOTION: Council Member Elwell moved to table this item until the next City Council meeting.
SECOND: Council Member Jolley
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Council Member Elwell |
AYE |
| Council Member McDonald |
AYE |
| Council Member Jolley |
AYE |
| Council Member Roberts |
AYE |
| Council Member Rusick |
AYE |
Judy Gubler provided a Transportation/Bus Service Survey to the City Council for their review. The City intends to include the survey with the newsletter in April so the City can access what the transportation needs are in Ivins. Council Member McDonald indicated Traci McDonald, who is sight impaired, is present and may be able to provide information to the City Council. Traci McDonald came forward and spoke regarding the needs in Ivins. Ms. McDonald has spoken with several individuals in Ivins and has researched the needs. She is willing to assist with dispensing the surveys to individuals she has spoken with previously. The Mayor and City Council are going to review the survey and provide Judy Gubler with their feedback. The surveys will be finalized, copies given to Traci McDonald and then sent out with the newsletter in April.
Judy Gubler indicated the only change to the plan is the phasing.
MOTION: Council Member McDonald moved to approve the amended phasing plan for the Development Agreement for Taviawk Phase 9
SECOND: Council Member Roberts
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Council Member Elwell |
AYE |
| Council Member McDonald |
AYE |
| Council Member Jolley |
AYE |
| Council Member Roberts |
AYE |
| Council Member Rusick |
AYE |
| G. |
Discuss and consider approval of Resolution No. 2010-06R a Resolution of Ivins City, Utah, Appointing a Chairperson to the Ivins Heritage Days and Heritage Art Festival Committee |
Judy Gubler provided historical financial information to the City Council for Heritage Days and Harvest Moon. A copy of the information is available by request through Ivins City Hall. Mayor Hart presented a concept of Heritage Days and Harvest Moon being combined into one event that is held annually on the second Saturday in October. The event would include arts, crafts, food, entertainment, the carnival at the school, the open house at the Public Safety building and similar activities. If the City Council likes the concept, the Mayor’s selection and recommendation for the Chairperson of the Heritage Days and Arts Festival Committee is Linda Elwell. Council Member Rusick suggested including the words "and Crafts" after the word "Arts". The Mayor and other City Council Members agreed.
MOTION: Council Member Elwell moved sustain the Mayor in his recommendation of Linda Elwell for Ivins Heritage Days and Arts and Crafts Festival to chair that committee and move that we approve Resolution No. 2010-06R a Resolution of Ivins City, Utah, Appointing the Chairperson Linda Elwell to the Ivins Heritage Days and Heritage Arts and Crafts Festival Committee.
SECOND: Council Member Jolley
VOTE: The motion carried unanimously.
| Council Member Elwell |
AYE |
| Council Member McDonald |
AYE |
| Council Member Jolley |
AYE |
| Council Member Roberts |
AYE |
| Council Member Rusick |
AYE |
Council Member Rusick - no report but indicated she has not seen the resumes for the individuals on the Solar City committee or Dave Toth on the Economic Development Committee. Mayor Hart indicated he will provide the Council with the resumes of those involved with the Solar City Initiative. Dave Toth is in the process of requesting the resumes from the individuals on the Economic Development Committee and once those have been provided, Mayor Hart will provide them to the Council.
Council Member Roberts reported that the individual who owns the Leeds Market has signed a lease and intends to open a market in Ivins on 200 East. The market should be opening in approximately one month. Council Member Roberts referred to the Amber Estates subdivision elevation issues and indicated the City needs to look at what occurred. Mayor Hart indicated that he, Chuck Gillette and Dave Glenn have a meeting with Mr. Disante and some other individuals tomorrow, March 5th to discuss the history of what occurred. Council Member Rusick referred to her neighbor's property that was built up 3 1/2 feet. There is an unintended consequence when the neighbor parks an 11 1/2’ foot RV. Mayor Hart is hoping to address issues in the City’s ordinances that need to be corrected or improved. Council Member Rusick indicated if there is a specific issue that needs to be addressed, it should be looked at and the City should not wait for the Planning Commission to go through all of the ordinances. It is important that the City look at the grading ordinance. Judy Gubler referred to the Citizen Comment that came forward previously from Mr. Disante that was forwarded to the Mayor and City Council Members. The issues in Amber Estates have been long and involved and Judy was particularly disturbed about the fact that she personally was accused of being unresponsive. If the Council Members look at the correspondence, the City has been responsive and the reasons why there was an approval are included in the correspondence.
Council Member Jolley attended the first Ivins Fitness Festival Committee meeting last night, March 3rd and was impressed and pleased that twenty to thirty (20-30) people were in attendance and eager to be involved. Council Member Jolley indicated there is going to be a similar event in Oceanside, CA at the end of March and the Chair of the Committee, Scott Raine, will be attending that event to observe what that City does. Mayor Hart indicated that The Biggest Loser Fitness Ridge has arranged for five (5) Biggest Loser veterans to speak at the Fitness Festival.
Council Member McDonald reported on e-scrap legislation relating to recycling of electronics in Washington County. The legislation passed unanimously but Washington County and a number of other Utah counties were excluded.
Council Member Elwell provided a handout regarding FIAS. A copy is available by request through Ivins City Hall. Red Rock Animal Alliance is a new program for low cost spay/neuter and three dogs have been adopted and are being sent to Vermont, Massachusetts and Florida. The Pound Puppy Gala will be held on April 24th. Judy Gubler referred to the newsletter and indicated individuals have called inquiring what happens with the Pets and requested FIAS provide that information so it can be put in the newsletter.
Mayor Hart reported on the following: The first Mayor’s forum was recorded and aired last night March 3rd and is scheduled to air on March 4th and March 5th on the Community Education Channel. There is going to be a story on the animal shelter and the Pound Puppy Gala; the neighborhood meetings have been well attended.
Judy Gubler reported on the following: a grocery store has submitted plans to the City; the City is working with Fitness Ridge regarding a temporary trailer that was placed on their property without the City’s knowledge or approval. Judy Gubler suggested the following items be on a future agenda: renaming 200 East to assist with obtaining grants and funding. Legislators do not consider 220 East to be a main road and that affects funding options; revisit the Resolution that addresses user rates for culinary water, wastewater and storm drain. There is an automatic increase that takes place every year in July for those rates. The City needs to continue with the increase for the storm drain but not for the water or sewer. Judy Gubler provided an email to the City Council from Dotti Higley regarding Color Country Housing’s impact fee deferral. Color Country is requesting the Council consider another approach for repayment of the deferred impact fees. The Mayor and City Council determined the Council will not reconsider the issue at this time. If Color Country Housing provides additional information to the City Attorney regarding the ten (10) year time frame for repayment of the deferred impact fees, the Council may reconsider the issue at that time. Judy Gubler reported the Wellness Fair was well attended.
| D. |
City Attorney, Dale Coulam - Excused. |
| E. |
Items to be placed on future agendas |